Negative ON-Page SEO Factors

Negative  ON-Page SEO Factors 

1)  Text presented in graphics form only No ACTUAL body text on the page :–: Text represented graphically is invisible to search engines.
2)  Affiliate site? :–:     The Florida update went after affiliates with a vengeance – flower and travel affiliates were hit hard – cookie-cutter sites with massive inter-linking, but little unique content. Subsequent updates have also targeted affiliates.
3)  Over optimization penalty (OOP)  :–: Penalty for over-compliance with well-established, accepted web optimization practices. Too high keyword repetition (keyword stuffing) may get you the OOP. Overuse of H1 tags has been mentioned. Meta-tag stuffing.
4)  Link to a bad neighborhood  :–: Don’t link to link farms, FFAs (Free For All’s) Also, don’t forget to check the Google status of EVERYONE you link to periodically. A site may go “bad”, and you can end up being penalized, even though you did nothing. For instance, some failed real estate sites have been switched to p0rn by unscrupulous webmasters, for the traffic. This is not good for you, if you are linking to the originally legitimate URL.
5)  Redirect thru refresh metatags  :–: Don’t immediately send your visitor to another page other than the one he/ she clicked on, using meta refresh.
6)  Poison words :–: The word “Links” in a title tag has been suggested to be a bad idea. Here is my list of Poison Words for Adsense. This penalty has been loosened – many of these words now appear in normal context, with no problems.
7)  Excessive cross-linking :–: “This does not apply to a small number of sites” .. (this author guesses the number 10, JAWG) “hosted on a local server”. . Matt Cutts July 2006
8) Vile language – ethnic slur :–: Including the George Carlin 7 bad words you can’t say on TV, plus the 150 or so that followed. Don’t shoot yourself right straight in the foot. Also, avoid combinations of normal words, which when used together, become something else entirely – such as the word juice, and the word l0ve. See why I wrote that zero? I don’t even want to get a proximity penalty, either. Paranoia, or caution? You decide. I always want to try to put my “best foot forward”.
9)  Stealing images/ text blocks from another domain :–: Copyright violation – Google responds strongly if you are reported. ref egol File Google DMCA
10) Keyword dilution :–: Targeting too many unrelated keywords on a page, which would detract from theming, and reduce the importance of your REALLY important keywords.
11) Keyword stuffing threshold :–: In body, meta tags, alt text, etc. = demotion
12) Page edit – can reduce consistency :–: Google is now switching between a “newer” cache, and several “older” caches, frequently drawing from BOTH at the same time.
13) Frequency of Content Change :–: Google patent – Too frequent = bad
14) Freshness of Anchor Text :–: Google patent – Too frequent = bad
15)  Dynamic Pages :–: Problematic – know pitfalls – shorten URLs, reduce variables (“. . no more than 2 or 3”, M.Cutts July 2006), lose the session IDs
16) Excessive Javascript :–: Don’t use for redirects, or hiding links
17) Flash page – NOT :–: Most (all-?) SE spiders can’t read Flash content Provide an HTML alternative, or experience lower SERP positioning.
18) Use of Frames :–: Spidering Problems with Frames – STILL
19) Robot exclusion “no index” tag :–: Intentional self-exclusion
20) Single pixel links :–: A red flag – one reason only – a sneaky link.
21) Invisible text :–:     OK – No penalty – Google advises against this. (The text is the same color as the background, and hence cannot be seen by the viewer, but can be visible to the search engine spiders.) I believe Google does penalize for hidden text, since it is an attempt to manipulate rank. Although they don’t catch everyone.
22) Gateway, doorway page :–: penalty – Google advises against this. Google used to reward these pages.
23) Duplicate content (YOUR’S) :–: OK – No penalty – Google advises against this. Google picks one (usually the oldest), and shoves it to the top, and pushes the second choice down. This has been a big issue with stolen content – the thief usurps your former position with YOUR OWN content.
24) HTML code violations :–: Doesn’t matter – Google advises against this. Unless of course, the page is totally FUBAR. Simple HTML verification is NOT required (but advised, since it could contribute to your page quality factor – PQF).
25) Phrase-based ranking, filters, penalties :–: Feb. 2007 – Google patent granted. Do not use phrases that have been associated and correlated with known spamming techniques, or you will be penalized. What phrases? Ahh, you tell me.
26) Poor spelling and grammar :–: Pages that are higher quality and more reputable (i.e. higher PageRank) tend to use better spelling and grammar. Demotion for bad spelling is highly logical.

Advertisements

6 responses to this post.

  1. Posted by Von on January 9, 2013 at 12:53 am

    Heya i am for the first time here. I came across this board and I find It really useful & it helped
    me out a lot. I hope to give something back and help
    others like you aided me.

    Reply

  2. Posted by web seo report on January 19, 2013 at 3:14 pm

    Hi, i read your blog occasionally and i own a similar one and i
    was just wondering if you get a lot of spam feedback? If so how do you reduce it, any plugin or anything you
    can recommend? I get so much lately it’s driving me insane so any help is very much appreciated.

    Reply

  3. Posted by Anonymous on February 12, 2013 at 10:15 am

    I don’t know if it’s just me or if everybody else encountering problems with your site.
    It seems like some of the written text on your posts are running off the screen.
    Can someone else please comment and let me know if this is happening to them as well?
    This might be a problem with my internet browser because I’ve had this happen previously. Kudos

    Reply

  4. Posted by wso plr on March 9, 2013 at 5:48 pm

    certainly like your website but you have to check the spelling on
    quite a few of your posts. Several of them are rife with spelling problems and I find it very bothersome to tell the truth however I’ll certainly come back again.

    Reply

  5. Posted by empower Network prosperity team on May 16, 2013 at 3:18 pm

    Hi all, here every one is sharing such know-how, thus it’s fastidious to read this blog, and I used to pay a visit this webpage everyday. Empower Network Prosperity team – empower network prosperity team – prosperity team

    Reply

  6. Posted by Korey on May 28, 2013 at 4:12 am

    Hello I am so grateful I found your blog page,
    I really found you by error, while I was searching on Digg for something
    else, Anyhow I am here now and would just like
    to say kudos for a marvelous post and a all round interesting blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time
    to browse it all at the minute but I have book-marked it and also added your RSS feeds, so when I have time
    I will be back to read more, Please do keep up the great work.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: